Trushali
- 21 July 2026
Coroner inquest into death of murdered baby Preston Davey to scrutinise public bodies
Published 20th Jul 2026, 16:49 BST
Updated 20th Jul 2026, 16:52 BST
A Blackpool coroner inquest hearing into the death of murdered adopted baby Preston Davey has heard that acts and omissions of public authorities still need to be scrutinised.
Alan Wilson, senior coroner for Blackpool and Fylde, said it is “highly likely” he will hold an inquest into the death of the 13-month-old, but made no final decision, he told Blackpool Coroner’s Court on Monday.
Preston, a “highly visible” adopted child, was murdered by former high school teacher Jamie Varley, 37, during a sex attack on July 27 2023. He had been in the process of adopting the child with his partner, former public schoolboy John McGowan-Fazakerley, 32, four months before the youngster’s death.
Blackpool coroner says inquest in Preston Davey death will ‘scrutinise’ public bodies | Iconic Media
The pair treated the child as their “plaything”, with the baby suffering “unremitting abuse” of sex assaults and physical attacks at their home on Staining Road, Staining. Varley, described as “evil” and a “sadist” by detectives, was given a whole life term for murder and 24 other offences after an eight-week trial ending in June. His co-defendant was jailed for 25 years.
Preston had been taken to Blackpool Victoria Hospital three times before his death and seen by a “battery of professionals” including medical staff, social workers and welfare officers from various bodies.
Mr Wilson told the hearing an inquest had initially been opened shortly after Preston’s death but was then suspended while police investigated, culminating in the trial and conviction of his adoptive parents.
Mr Wilson said he had to consider whether an inquest should continue, given “relevant issues” had already been heard during the eight-week criminal trial. However, while he said he would not make a final decision today, subject to submissions from lawyers for other public bodies, it was “highly likely” one would take place, probably in the autumn of next year.
Mr Wilson said: “I feel there’s sufficient reason to resume. There are acts and omissions of public authorities that need to be scrutinized in a public hearing in which Preston’s family can participate. It’s clearly going to be a wide-ranging inquiry.”
.png?crop=3:2,smart&trim=&width=640&quality=65)
Major Blackpool coroner update on inquest into death of murdered baby Preston Davey | Iconic Media
The coroner said he was aware there had been calls for a public inquiry, but his role meant that was not a matter for himself to consider, but to proceed on the basis of whether or not to hold an inquest.
The court heard Oldham Safeguarding Children’s Partnership, had resumed a review into Preston’s death, following its suspension for the criminal trial to take place. This review is likely only to be completed by January 2027, and the inquest cannot be held before then, the court heard.
Much of the hearing was dealing with which people or public bodies should be legally represented at any inquest. They include Preston’s biological mother and grandmother, Sara and Debbie Davey, neither of whom were present for the hearing but were represented by lawyers in court.
Preston was born while his mother was in custody and a place in a mother and baby unit in prison was refused, the court heard. Instead, he was taken from her by a court order from Oldham Council and placed with temporary adoptive parents before being adopted by Varley and McGowan.
Adoption Now, which handled Preston’s adoption, was represented at the hearing, along with Bolton Council, described as the “host” council for the body. While Oldham Council managed Preston’s adoption, Bolton Council also a had a role, the hearing was told.
.png?crop=3:2,smart&trim=&width=640&quality=65)
Preston Davey | Iconic Media
Also present were lawyers for Gary Nolan, Preston’s father, along with legal representatives for the NHS trust running Blackpool Victoria Hospital. Whether South Shore Academy, the high school where Varley worked should be involved in the inquest, is a matter still to be resolved, the hearing was told.
And also to be decided is whether Lancashire Police should have lawyers representing the force at an inquest.
The trial heard their officers had been called after Preston had been taken for the first time to hospital suffering injuries and safeguarding concerns were raised, but no further action was taken.
Mr Wilson adjourned for a further hearing to be held in October, telling Preston’s father: “Please accept everyone’s condolences, I’m conscious we are approaching his anniversary.”
Preston Davey deserved better. Demand a national inquiry – sign the petition here https://c.org/YPqpzTJDbt | Blackpool Gazette
https://www.change.org/p/preston-davey-deserved-better-demand-a-national-inquiry
Preston Davey deserved better
Preston Davey was 13-months-old when he was murdered by the man who was in the process of adopting him. The man he came to know as ‘dad’.
In less than four months, little Preston was sexually assaulted, physically and emotional abused, and left with 40 non-accidential injuries. He was taken to hospital three times. Social workers visited regularly. His abusers even admitted to having dark thoughts about him. And still, nothing stopped it.
Jamie Varley, 37, was given a whole life sentence for murder, child cruelty, sexual offences and indecent images relating to Preston. His now ex-partner, John McGowan-Fazakerley, 32, was jailed for 25 years for allowing the death of a child, child cruelty and sexual assault.
But the question that has to be asked – and answered – is how a baby boy in the care of the state could be so badly let down by every system designed to protect him.
We need answers. Specifically:
– Why were repeated warning signs – three hospital admissions, an abuser’s own admission of dark thoughts, routine social worker contact – not acted on?
– Should children placed outside their home authority automatically be assigned a local social worker with direct oversight of their care?
– How are repeat hospital admissions for children in care shared between the NHS, the placing authority, and the authority where the child lives?
– Are adoption vetting procedures rigorous enough to stop prospective adopters hiding behind a false front?
We need you to sign this petition and demand the government acts.
Every child who comes after Preston deserves better too.